Frederick S. Cross

41 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Frederick S. Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Internal Medicine 63
  • Speech and Hearing 97
  • Gastroenterology 69
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 182
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 29
Replace Ivan A. May with:
Ivan A. May United States
Osler A. Abbott United States
Skinner Db United States
Joel A. Johnson United States
Eoin Aberdeen United Kingdom
Merendino Ka United States
P.N. Symbas United States
Gil Hauer Santos United States
Kathleen N. Fenton United States
Celal Tekinbaş Türkiye
Frederick S. Cross relative to Ivan A. May United States Ivan A. May's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Ivan A. May · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick S. Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick S. Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick S. Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick S. Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick S. Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick S. Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick S. Cross. The network helps show where Frederick S. Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Frederick S. Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick S. Cross Line = papers co-authored together Frederick S. Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196763
2 196161
3 198132
4 198928
5 195727
6 196624
7 195921
8 196820
9 195819
10 196617
11
Surgical treatment of mitral insufficiency.
195517
12 195515
13 195613
14 196613
15 196413
16 195711
17 196910
18 19559
19 19648
20 19668

About Frederick S. Cross

Frederick S. Cross is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 41 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (9 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (7 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (6 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (5 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (63 citations), Speech and Hearing (97 citations), Gastroenterology (69 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (182 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (29 citations). Frederick S. Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Earle B. Kay, Richard D. Jones, Richard D. Jones, James A. Lehman, Robert M. Berne, George Van S. Smith, Claude M. Grondin, Helmut Schreiber, Alfred N. Gerein and George F. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, The American Journal of Cardiology, Cancer and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact