Frederick Nevens

558 citations
12 papers · 406 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Hepatology top 5%
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation
    • Liver Diseases and Immunity
    • Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

Papers in

    • Liver Disease and Transplantation 7
    • Liver Diseases and Immunity 1
    • Hepatitis C virus research 1
    • Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments 2

Frederick Nevens

12 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

Frederick Nevens
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Hepatology 219
  • Gastroenterology 36
  • Oncology 56
  • Surgery 73
  • Parasitology 7
Replace Wai‐Wah Ng with:
Wai‐Wah Ng Taiwan
Daisaku Nishimura Japan
Kensuke Fujii Japan
Maxime Sodji France
George Rekoumis Greece
Emile Alexandre Pariente France
P Błoch France
Federica Spatola Italy
Roberto Pisa Italy
Manjushree Gautam United States
Frederick Nevens relative to Wai‐Wah Ng Taiwan Wai‐Wah Ng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16×
Wai‐Wah Ng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Nevens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Nevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Nevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Nevens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Nevens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Nevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Nevens. The network helps show where Frederick Nevens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Nevens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Nevens Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Nevens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1997201
2 201264
3 200551
4 200423
5 201514
6 200013
7 200811
8 201610
9 20129
10 19995
11
Hepatitis C genotype 4 response rate to pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment in Belgium is similar to genotype 1.
20103
12 19982

About Frederick Nevens

Frederick Nevens is a scholar working on Hepatology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Oncology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease and Transplantation (7 papers), Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments (2 papers), Liver Diseases and Immunity (1 paper), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Hepatitis C virus research (1 paper) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (219 citations), Gastroenterology (36 citations), Oncology (56 citations), Surgery (73 citations) and Parasitology (7 citations). Frederick Nevens has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Greece and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Johan Fevery, Alec Avgerinos, Sotos A. Raptis, Jacques Pirenne, Geert A. Maleux, René M. M. van Aerts, Johan Van Cleemput, Daan Dierickx, Dirk R. J. Kuypers and Ch. De Wolf-Peeters. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hepatology, The Lancet, British Journal of Radiology, American Journal of Transplantation and Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact