Frederick L. Bloom

8 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers

Frederick L. Bloom
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Virology 144
  • Infectious Diseases 164
  • Immunology and Allergy 38
  • Emergency Medicine 52
  • Immunology 98
Replace Jorge Pinto with:
Jorge Pinto Brazil
Marja H. Suur Netherlands
Hensley Gt United States
Giovanni Mazzarello Italy
Mark F. Sands United States
Philip A. Pizzo United States
Sebastian Lucas United Kingdom
Nening M. Nanlohy Netherlands
Bruce S. Kahn United States
Joseph E. Peña United States
Frederick L. Bloom relative to Jorge Pinto Brazil Jorge Pinto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Jorge Pinto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick L. Bloom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick L. Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick L. Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick L. Bloom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick L. Bloom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick L. Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick L. Bloom. The network helps show where Frederick L. Bloom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick L. Bloom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick L. Bloom Line = papers co-authored together Frederick L. Bloom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1984316
2 198657
3 197632
4 198124
5 19844
6 19852
7 19761
8 20091
9
Spirometric Comparison of Carbuterol and Isoproterenol Aerosol Therapy in Bronchial Asthma
20150

About Frederick L. Bloom

Frederick L. Bloom is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, Neurology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (2 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (2 papers), HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (144 citations), Infectious Diseases (164 citations), Immunology and Allergy (38 citations), Emergency Medicine (52 citations) and Immunology (98 citations). Frederick L. Bloom has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wade P. Parks, Gwendolyn B. Scott, Billy E. Buck, Barbara A. Burke, Richard G. Curless, Eduardo Bancalari, Ronald N. Goldberg, Charles R. Bauer, Robert B. Rhoades and Heinz J. Wittig. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, New England Journal of Medicine, Pediatric Research, The Journal of Pediatrics and Parkinsonism & Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact