Frederick J. Moore

19 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Frederick J. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Internal Medicine 20
  • Hematology 55
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 77
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 55
  • Genetics 17
Replace K. Grette with:
K. Grette Norway
Stig‐Arne Johansson Sweden
G Schettler Germany
Yoshimi Ota Japan
Catherine Berry France
Hidetoshi Ujiie Japan
Kyu Taik Lee United States
M. Ongari Italy
L Marianowski Poland
Corinne Lacquemant France
Frederick J. Moore relative to K. Grette Norway K. Grette's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
K. Grette · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick J. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick J. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick J. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick J. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick J. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick J. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick J. Moore. The network helps show where Frederick J. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Frederick J. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick J. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Frederick J. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195273
2 196064
3 196264
4 196019
5 195318
6 195418
7 19517
8 19526
9 19576
10 19555
11 19634
12 19633
13
Clinical trial of the Penn test for cancer.
19563
14 19653
15 19622
16 19702
17 19572
18 19572
19 20211
20 19641

About Frederick J. Moore

Frederick J. Moore is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Physiology, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 23 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (3 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper), Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Poxvirus research and outbreaks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (20 citations), Hematology (55 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (77 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (55 citations) and Genetics (17 citations). Frederick J. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Jessie Marmorston, Samuel I. Rapaport, Mary Jane Patch, John M. Weiner, Arnold G. Ware, Christopher E. Hopkins, Marie N. Lipsett, H. Sobel, C. Smith and Oscar Magidson. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Biology and Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Annals of Internal Medicine, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact