Frédérick de Meyer

29 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Frédérick de Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 28
  • Molecular Biology 644
  • Catalysis 65
  • Mechanical Engineering 288
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 215
Replace Matthew T. Stone with:
Matthew T. Stone United States
Kwang‐Im Oh South Korea
Andrey I. Frolov Germany
Sudip Chakraborty India
Seifollah Jalili Iran
Xinfeng Gao United States
Mine Yurtsever Türkiye
Florian Evers Germany
Sungsool Wi United States
David J. Graves United States
Frédérick de Meyer relative to Matthew T. Stone United States Matthew T. Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Matthew T. Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédérick de Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédérick de Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédérick de Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédérick de Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédérick de Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédérick de Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédérick de Meyer. The network helps show where Frédérick de Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédérick de Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédérick de Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Frédérick de Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009373
2 2008154
3 201099
4 202181
5 201273
6 201068
7 202245
8 202237
9 202233
10 202130
11 202129
12 202122
13 202120
14 200915
15 202312
16 202312
17 202110
18 202210
19 20238
20 20238

About Frédérick de Meyer

Frédérick de Meyer is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (18 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (15 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (11 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers), Industrial Gas Emission Control (4 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (4 papers) and Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (28 citations), Molecular Biology (644 citations), Catalysis (65 citations), Mechanical Engineering (288 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (215 citations). Frédérick de Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Berend Smit, Jocelyn M. Rodgers, Maddalena Venturoli, Christophe Coquelet, Xavier Rozanska, Stéphane Jouenne, Thomas Willems, E. Wimmer, Jesper Givskov Sørensen and Birgit Schiøtt. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Fluid Phase Equilibria, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Biophysical Journal and Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact