Frédéric Taithe

1.2k citations
24 papers · 149 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Taithe

21 papers receiving 147 citations

Peers

Frédéric Taithe
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 67
  • Neurology 41
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 22
  • Oncology 31
  • Rheumatology 14
Replace Tuncay Gündüz with:
Tuncay Gündüz Türkiye
Michael Lenihan United States
Yusuke Moriya Japan
Shannon Beres United States
Dipak Ram United Kingdom
Nik Krajnc Austria
Justin Abbatemarco United States
Elisa Vegezzi Italy
Sona Narula United States
Sini M. Laakso Finland
Frédéric Taithe relative to Tuncay Gündüz Türkiye Tuncay Gündüz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Tuncay Gündüz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Taithe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Taithe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Taithe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Taithe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Taithe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Taithe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Taithe. The network helps show where Frédéric Taithe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Taithe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Taithe Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Taithe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201746
2 201820
3 201915
4 20178
5 20097
6 20096
7 20166
8 20155
9
[Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: theoretical and practical aspects].
20095
10 20204
11 20184
12 20224
13 20244
14 20192
15 20072
16 20182
17 20242
18
[Gait and balance disorders. Fall in the elderly].
20052
19 20192
20 20241

About Frédéric Taithe

Frédéric Taithe is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 24 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (8 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (8 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (7 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (4 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Bartonella species infections research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (67 citations), Neurology (41 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (22 citations), Oncology (31 citations) and Rheumatology (14 citations). Frédéric Taithe has collaborated with scholars based in France, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Clavelou, Xavier Moisset, Bruno Pereira, Christine Lebrun‐Frénay, Fréderic Dutheil, Émilie Dumont, François‐Xavier Lesage, Laurent Gerbaud, Jean‐Michel Vallat and Armelle Magot. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neurology, Neurology, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Journal of the Neurological Sciences and Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact