Frédéric Schmidt

1.6k citations
77 papers · 971 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Schmidt

74 papers receiving 947 citations

Peers

Frédéric Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 617
  • Atmospheric Science 286
  • Earth-Surface Processes 100
  • Media Technology 109
  • Environmental Chemistry 64
Replace M. S. Gilmore with:
M. S. Gilmore United States
M. Vincendon France
H. Hoffmann Germany
S. M. Wiseman United States
M. Sgavetti Italy
Jean‐Philippe Combe United States
K. D. Seelos United States
Francesca Altieri Italy
J. L. Piatek United States
Michel Berthé France
Frédéric Schmidt relative to M. S. Gilmore United States M. S. Gilmore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
M. S. Gilmore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Schmidt. The network helps show where Frédéric Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201680
2 201252
3 201050
4 201545
5 201543
6 201240
7 201239
8 201937
9 200833
10 201233
11 202030
12 201030
13 201128
14 201525
15 202121
16 201421
17 201920
18 201620
19 201019
20 201018

About Frédéric Schmidt

Frédéric Schmidt is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 77 papers that have together received 971 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (51 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (41 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (14 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (8 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (7 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (7 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (7 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (617 citations), Atmospheric Science (286 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (100 citations), Media Technology (109 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (64 citations). Frédéric Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include J. Fernando, S. Douté, Xavier Ceamanos, H. Massol, P. Pinet, M. Vincendon, Inès Belgacem, S. Lovejoy, C. Pilorget and Y. Daydou. Their work appears in journals such as Icarus, Planetary and Space Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets, The Planetary Science Journal and Space Science Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact