Frédéric Pinna
Impact in
-
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Papers in
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies 3
-
- Neurological disorders and treatments 2
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Mahmoud Charif (6 shared papers)Xavier Ayrignac (6 shared papers)Emmanuelle Le Bars (3 shared papers)Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur (4 shared papers)Jérémy Deverdun (3 shared papers)Tobias Kober (1 shared paper)Pierre Labauge (2 shared papers)Aleksandra Maleska Maceski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurology (1 paper)Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (1 paper)Journal of Neurology (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)American Journal of Neuroradiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Frédéric Pinna
5 papers receiving 125 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Developmental Neuroscience 19
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 76
- Neurology 52
- Neurology 20
- Rheumatology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Pinna
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Pinna's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Pinna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Pinna more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Pinna
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Pinna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Pinna. The network helps show where Frédéric Pinna may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Pinna, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 0 |
About Frédéric Pinna
Frédéric Pinna is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Rheumatology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 6 papers that have together received 126 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (1 paper), Neurological and metabolic disorders (1 paper), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (1 paper), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (19 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (76 citations), Neurology (52 citations), Neurology (20 citations) and Rheumatology (18 citations). Frédéric Pinna has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mahmoud Charif, Xavier Ayrignac, Emmanuelle Le Bars, Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur, Jérémy Deverdun, Tobias Kober, Pierre Labauge, Aleksandra Maleska Maceski, Mário João Fartaria and Christophe Hirtz. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Journal of Neurology, Scientific Reports and American Journal of Neuroradiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.