Frédéric Mothe

83 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Frédéric Mothe
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Building and Construction 581
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 377
  • Atmospheric Science 277
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 179
  • Environmental Engineering 117
Replace Fleur Longuetaud with:
Fleur Longuetaud France
Jean-Michel Leban France
Richard F. Daniels United States
Francis Colin France
Robert Evans Australia
Laurence R. Schimleck United States
Thiéry Constant France
Mériem Fournier France
Franka Brüchert Germany
John R. Moore New Zealand
Frédéric Mothe relative to Fleur Longuetaud France Fleur Longuetaud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Fleur Longuetaud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Mothe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Mothe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Mothe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Mothe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Mothe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Mothe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Mothe. The network helps show where Frédéric Mothe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Mothe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Mothe Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Mothe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200989
2 201289
3 201779
4 199867
5 201158
6 200457
7 200657
8 200856
9 199353
10 201747
11 201245
12 201238
13 201635
14 201334
15 200533
16 200731
17 201028
18 201227
19 201327
20 201526

About Frédéric Mothe

Frédéric Mothe is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Atmospheric Science and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wood Treatment and Properties (43 papers), Forest ecology and management (30 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (16 papers), Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (13 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (6 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Forest Management and Policy (5 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Building and Construction (581 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (377 citations), Atmospheric Science (277 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (179 citations) and Environmental Engineering (117 citations). Frédéric Mothe has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Fleur Longuetaud, Jean-Michel Leban, Thiéry Constant, Gérard Nepveu, Isabelle Debled-Rennesson, Bertrand Kerautret, Francis Colin, Rémy Marchal, Gilles Le Moguédec and Christine Deleuze. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Forest Science, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Trees, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact