Frédéric Mothe

56 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Frédéric Mothe
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 582
  • Building and Construction 373
  • Environmental Engineering 302
  • Global and Planetary Change 304
  • Atmospheric Science 236
Replace Fleur Longuetaud with:
Fleur Longuetaud France
Sven‐Olof Lundqvist Sweden
Jean-Michel Leban France
Alexander Clark United States
Thiéry Constant France
Paloma de Palacios Spain
Isabelle Duchesne Canada
Jan-Willem van de Kuilen Germany
Joseph Dahlen United States
Luis García Esteban Spain
Frédéric Mothe relative to Fleur Longuetaud France Fleur Longuetaud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Fleur Longuetaud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Mothe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Mothe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Mothe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Mothe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Mothe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Mothe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Mothe. The network helps show where Frédéric Mothe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Mothe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Mothe Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Mothe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200988
2 201286
3 201779
4 199866
5 200456
6 200855
7 201154
8 200654
9 201744
10 201243
11 201237
12 201635
13 201334
14 200533
15 200732
16 201028
17 201328
18 201226
19 201525
20 200724

About Frédéric Mothe

Frédéric Mothe is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Building and Construction and Organic Chemistry, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (37 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (23 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (20 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (19 papers), Wood and Agarwood Research (13 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (8 papers) and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (582 citations), Building and Construction (373 citations), Environmental Engineering (302 citations), Global and Planetary Change (304 citations) and Atmospheric Science (236 citations). Frédéric Mothe has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Fleur Longuetaud, Jean-Michel Leban, Thiéry Constant, Isabelle Debled-Rennesson, Bertrand Kerautret, Francis Colin, Christine Deleuze, Gérard Nepveu, Gilles Le Moguédec and Louis Denaud. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Forest Science, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Trees, Forest Ecology and Management and Wood Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact