Frédéric Martens

554 citations
30 papers · 416 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Martens

27 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Frédéric Martens
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 224
  • Pharmacology 78
  • Neurology 51
  • Surgery 131
  • Epidemiology 33
Replace Dilip Chand Raja Soundararajan with:
Dilip Chand Raja Soundararajan India
Rami David Israel
Henning Graßhoff Germany
James van Dellen United Kingdom
Rick A. Davis United States
Kenny Samuel David India
Akiharu Kurihara Japan
Atsuhiko Hirasawa Japan
Osmar Avanzi Brazil
Nitin Maruti Adsul South Korea
Frédéric Martens relative to Dilip Chand Raja Soundararajan India Dilip Chand Raja Soundararajan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Dilip Chand Raja Soundararajan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Martens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Martens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Martens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Martens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Martens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Martens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Martens. The network helps show where Frédéric Martens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Martens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Martens Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Martens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201866
2 200942
3 201732
4 201631
5 201826
6 198921
7 198820
8 201519
9 199018
10 198818
11 202117
12 199216
13 199415
14 201811
15 201611
16 19919
17 19878
18 20027
19 20186
20 19935

About Frédéric Martens

Frédéric Martens is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Pharmacology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (2 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (224 citations), Pharmacology (78 citations), Neurology (51 citations), Surgery (131 citations) and Epidemiology (33 citations). Frédéric Martens has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luc Verbeke, L. Calliauw, Jonathan R. Stieber, Rudolf Fritsch, Bernard Verbeeten Jr., Dimitri Hemelsoet, Peter Vanlangenhove, Dirk Van Roost, Jouke Dijkstra and Willem Jan J. van Rooij. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, The Spine Journal, Acta Neurochirurgica, Journal of neurosurgery and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact