Frédéric Li

770 citations
25 papers · 509 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Li

23 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Frédéric Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 256
  • Signal Processing 64
  • Human-Computer Interaction 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 83
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
Replace Muhammad Adeel Nisar with:
Muhammad Adeel Nisar Germany
Stephen Xia United States
Heli Koskimäki Finland
Narit Hnoohom Thailand
Kerem Altun Türkiye
Stefan Oniga Hungary
Hao Tian China
Fangmin Sun China
Marc Bächlin Switzerland
Frédéric Li relative to Muhammad Adeel Nisar Germany Muhammad Adeel Nisar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Muhammad Adeel Nisar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Li. The network helps show where Frédéric Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Li Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018243
2 202048
3 202231
4 202130
5 202028
6 202021
7 202216
8 202315
9 202314
10 202311
11 202211
12 20188
13 20227
14 20236
15 20244
16 20154
17 20242
18 20252
19 20232
20 20232

About Frédéric Li

Frédéric Li is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotion and Mood Recognition (6 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (3 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (256 citations), Signal Processing (64 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (32 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (83 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations). Frédéric Li has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Poland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Marcin Grzegorzek, Kimiaki Shirahama, Muhammad Adeel Nisar, Lukas Köping, Xinyu Huang, Kerstin Luedtke, Tibor M. Szikszay, Wacław M. Adamczyk, Roland Wismüller and Sebastian Fudickar. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Scientific Reports and Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact