Frédéric Laville

73 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Frédéric Laville
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Speech and Hearing 89
  • Otorhinolaryngology 55
  • Sensory Systems 42
  • Signal Processing 99
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 160
Replace Elliott H. Berger with:
Elliott H. Berger United States
Nicola Prodi Italy
Ryota Shimokura Japan
Kenji Kurakata Japan
R.J.J.H. van Son Netherlands
Chucri A. Kardous United States
Marcos D. Fernández Spain
José A. Ballesteros Spain
Geoff Leventhall United States
Marion Burgess Australia
Frédéric Laville relative to Elliott H. Berger United States Elliott H. Berger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Elliott H. Berger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Laville

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Laville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Laville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Laville more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Laville

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Laville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Laville. The network helps show where Frédéric Laville may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Laville, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Laville Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Laville links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201148
2 200937
3 201434
4 200021
5 200020
6 201417
7 199116
8 200016
9 201413
10 200013
11 201411
12
Expandable earplug with smart custom fitting capabilities
200211
13 201511
14 199510
15 201610
16 20158
17 20138
18 20158
19 20098
20
New method and device for customizing in situ a hearing protector
20047

About Frédéric Laville

Frédéric Laville is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Civil and Structural Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Signal Processing and Speech and Hearing, having authored 80 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (24 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (20 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (17 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (15 papers), Noise Effects and Management (13 papers), Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control (10 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (9 papers) and Vibration and Dynamic Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (89 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (55 citations), Sensory Systems (42 citations), Signal Processing (99 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (160 citations). Frédéric Laville has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include Jérémie Voix, Franck Sgard, Hugues Nélisse, Yvan Petit, Olivier Doutres, Matthew J. Miller, Alain Berry, Marc Thomas, Jean Nicolas and Raymond Panneton. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Applied Acoustics, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Noise and Health and Canadian acoustics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact