Frederic Hicks
Impact in
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 0.2%
- Latin American history and culture
- Archeology top 2%
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
Papers in
-
- Latin American history and culture 15
-
- Archaeology and Natural History 5
- Indigenous Cultures and History 2
- Co-authors
- Ross Hassig (1 shared paper)Stephen A. Kowalewski (1 shared paper)Mary E. D. Pohl (1 shared paper)Charles S. Spencer (1 shared paper)Terence N. D’Altroy (1 shared paper)Mary W. Helms (1 shared paper)David G. Anderson (1 shared paper)Helen Perlstein Pollard (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ethnohistory (5 papers)Ancient Mesoamerica (3 papers)Current Anthropology (2 papers)American Ethnologist (2 papers)Hispanic American Historical Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frederic Hicks
25 papers receiving 507 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 286
- Archeology 58
- Paleontology 335
- Anthropology 254
- Geography, Planning and Development 66
Countries citing papers authored by Frederic Hicks
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic Hicks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic Hicks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic Hicks. The network helps show where Frederic Hicks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederic Hicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 143 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 136 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 103 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 62 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 38 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1961 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1970 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1967 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 4 |
About Frederic Hicks
Frederic Hicks is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Anthropology, Demography, Paleontology and Cultural Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Latin American history and culture (15 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (5 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers), Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education (3 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (2 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (2 papers), Indigenous Cultures and History (2 papers) and Historical Studies in Latin America (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (286 citations), Archeology (58 citations), Paleontology (335 citations), Anthropology (254 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (66 citations). Frederic Hicks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ross Hassig, Stephen A. Kowalewski, Mary E. D. Pohl, Charles S. Spencer, Terence N. D’Altroy, Mary W. Helms, David G. Anderson, Helen Perlstein Pollard, J. Elizabeth Clark and Bruce E. Byland. Their work appears in journals such as Ethnohistory, Ancient Mesoamerica, Current Anthropology, American Ethnologist and Hispanic American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.