Frederic C. Deyo

38 papers receiving 929 citations

Peers

Frederic C. Deyo
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Public Administration 284
  • Development 134
  • Political Science and International Relations 707
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 173
  • Sociology and Political Science 527
Replace Kees van der Pijl with:
Kees van der Pijl United Kingdom
Dorothee Böhle Austria
Eric A. Nordlinger United States
Bárbara Stallings United States
Minxin Pei United States
Anne Marie Goetz United Kingdom
David C. Kang United States
Nita Rudra United States
Karen L. Remmer United States
Timothy J. Sinclair United Kingdom
Frederic C. Deyo relative to Kees van der Pijl United Kingdom Kees van der Pijl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Kees van der Pijl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic C. Deyo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic C. Deyo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic C. Deyo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic C. Deyo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic C. Deyo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic C. Deyo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic C. Deyo. The network helps show where Frederic C. Deyo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Frederic C. Deyo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic C. Deyo Line = papers co-authored together Frederic C. Deyo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989270
2 1991264
3 1988149
4 198291
5 199260
6 201950
7 200246
8 199634
9 199629
10 199025
11 199725
12 199223
13 198721
14 201218
15 198918
16 199017
17
Reforming Asian Labor Systems: Economic Tensions and Worker Dissent
201216
18 199810
19 199410
20 20079

About Frederic C. Deyo

Frederic C. Deyo is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Industrial and Economic Development (14 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (10 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Global trade and economics (3 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers) and Economic Zones and Regional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (284 citations), Development (134 citations), Political Science and International Relations (707 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (173 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (527 citations). Frederic C. Deyo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include William Diebold, Chalmers A. Johnson, Robert Wade, Alice H. Amsden, Ziya Öniş, Richard F. Doner, Eric Hershberg, John Patrick Walsh, Anita M. Weiss and Gary S. Fields. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Human Organization and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact