Frederic C. Deyo

2.7k citations
46 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Frederic C. Deyo

39 papers receiving 913 citations

Peers

Frederic C. Deyo
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Public Administration 282
  • Development 134
  • Political Science and International Relations 693
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 169
  • Sociology and Political Science 501
Replace Kees van der Pijl with:
Kees van der Pijl United Kingdom
Meredith Woo‐Cumings United States
Edmund Terence Gomez Malaysia
Bastiaan van Apeldoorn Netherlands
Bárbara Stallings United States
Ian Bruff United Kingdom
Dorothee Böhle Austria
Eric A. Nordlinger United States
Anne Marie Goetz United Kingdom
Jan Drahokoupil Belgium
Frederic C. Deyo relative to Kees van der Pijl United Kingdom Kees van der Pijl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kees van der Pijl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic C. Deyo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic C. Deyo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic C. Deyo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic C. Deyo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic C. Deyo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic C. Deyo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic C. Deyo. The network helps show where Frederic C. Deyo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Frederic C. Deyo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic C. Deyo Line = papers co-authored together Frederic C. Deyo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989278
2 1991271
3 1988149
4 199261
5 201951
6 200248
7 199636
8 199630
9 199725
10 199025
11 199224
12 198921
13 198721
14 199921
15 201219
16 199018
17 201217
18 199811
19 199410
20 20079

About Frederic C. Deyo

Frederic C. Deyo is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Industrial and Economic Development (15 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (10 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (282 citations), Development (134 citations), Political Science and International Relations (693 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (169 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (501 citations). Frederic C. Deyo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include William Diebold, Chalmers Johnson, Robert Wade, Zіya Önіş, Alice H. Amsden, Eric Hershberg, Richard F. Doner, John P. Walsh, Anita M. Weiss and Paul K. Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Journal of Asian Studies, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Foreign Affairs and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact