Frederic C. Benham

40 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Frederic C. Benham
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Economics and Econometrics 217
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 62
  • Gender Studies 71
  • Demography 82
  • Development 26
Replace Walter T. Newlyn with:
Walter T. Newlyn United Kingdom
M. P. T. India
Marcelo Selowsky United States
Jacob P. Meerman United States
David Turnham France
W. Klatt Austria
Norman L. Hicks United States
Peter R. Fallon United Kingdom
Ehtisham Ahmad United Kingdom
Mukul G. Asher Singapore
Frederic C. Benham relative to Walter T. Newlyn United Kingdom Walter T. Newlyn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Walter T. Newlyn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic C. Benham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic C. Benham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic C. Benham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic C. Benham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic C. Benham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic C. Benham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic C. Benham. The network helps show where Frederic C. Benham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Frederic C. Benham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic C. Benham Line = papers co-authored together Frederic C. Benham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1959284
2 195643
3 195632
4 196029
5 196018
6 195918
7 196015
8 195915
9 19597
10 19616
11 19595
12 19585
13 19615
14 19545
15 19584
16 19614
17 19564
18 19563
19 19563
20 19523

About Frederic C. Benham

Frederic C. Benham is a scholar working on Anthropology, Development, Literature and Literary Theory, Finance and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (5 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (5 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (2 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), EU Law and Policy Analysis (1 paper), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (1 paper) and European Union Policy and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (217 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (62 citations), Gender Studies (71 citations), Demography (82 citations) and Development (26 citations). Frederic C. Benham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Audrey G. Donnithorne, Kenneth E. Boulding, Jack Wiseman, Richard Arthur Preston, Paul Anthony Samuelson, Grant L. Reuber, Linden A. Mander, James C. Ingram, Kurt Schaldemose Hansen and Tibor Barna. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, Economica, Pacific Affairs, Journal of the American Statistical Association and Geographical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact