Fred Schobben

14 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Fred Schobben
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 215
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 120
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 187
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 19
Replace Jochen G.W. Theis with:
Jochen G.W. Theis Canada
Daniel B. Williams United States
Carl Zelson United States
George Blinick United States
Júlia Ojuel Spain
B. Bødker Denmark
Elke Griesmaier Austria
Pat Tennis United States
David C. Abramson United States
Deborah T. Combs‐Cantrell United States
Fred Schobben relative to Jochen G.W. Theis Canada Jochen G.W. Theis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jochen G.W. Theis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Schobben

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Schobben's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Schobben with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Schobben more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Schobben

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Schobben. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Schobben. The network helps show where Fred Schobben may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Schobben, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Schobben Line = papers co-authored together Fred Schobben links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2006147
2 1975125
3 200984
4 200741
5 198034
6 197532
7 200924
8 199517
9 19807
10 19774
11 19973
12 19833
13
Clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic application of antiepileptic drugs.
19832
14
Optimal dosing of aminoglycosides using computerised models.
19881

About Fred Schobben

Fred Schobben is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (215 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (187 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (19 citations). Fred Schobben has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Armenia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Eppo van der Kleijn, F.J.M. Gabreëls, Gerard H. A. Visser, Tessa Ververs, Toine C. G. Egberts, Lolkje de Jong‐van den Berg, F.W.H.M. Merkus, Tom B. Vree, Herman P. van Geijn and Hans Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of Chromatography A, BMC Health Services Research, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and The American Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact