Fred Schmidt

2.6k citations
93 papers · 2.1k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Schmidt

86 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Fred Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Clinical Psychology 905
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 295
  • Radiation 181
  • Atmospheric Science 222
  • Sociology and Political Science 525
Replace David Jones with:
David Jones United Kingdom
D. J. Andrews United States
Robert W. Hill United States
Timo Jaakkola Finland
Detlef H. Rost Germany
D.J. Miller United States
L. J. Smith United States
Glenn H. Miller United States
Gill Hubbard United Kingdom
A. I. Harris United States
Fred Schmidt relative to David Jones United Kingdom David Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
David Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Schmidt. The network helps show where Fred Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Fred Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991208
2 1998185
3 2005181
4 2010111
5 2008111
6 196488
7 200882
8 200682
9 198752
10 196644
11 197740
12 200238
13 197738
14 196937
15 202237
16 195735
17 201534
18 196531
19 200029
20 195529

About Fred Schmidt

Fred Schmidt is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (11 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (10 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (9 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (8 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (6 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (905 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (295 citations), Radiation (181 citations), Atmospheric Science (222 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (525 citations). Fred Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ted Κ. Taylor, Robert D. Hoge, Mary Ann Campbell, George Farwell, Debra Pepler, Pieter Meiert Grootes, J. B. Gerhart, W. A. Kolasinski, Thomas A. Brown and Ronald E. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Criminal Justice and Behavior, Review of Scientific Instruments, Children and Youth Services Review, Journal of Child and Family Studies and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact