Fred Johnson

500 citations
20 papers · 366 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Johnson

13 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Fred Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Philosophy 70
  • Literature and Literary Theory 55
  • Language and Linguistics 47
  • Public Administration 11
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 36
Replace Malcolm O. Sillars with:
Malcolm O. Sillars United States
David Godden United States
Jan Albert van Laar Netherlands
Frederick L. Will United States
Jim Mackenzie Australia
Robert C. Pinto Canada
Julie Mathews-Aydınlı Türkiye
Jaime Nubiola Spain
Myron Tuman United States
Elena Musi United Kingdom
Fred Johnson relative to Malcolm O. Sillars United States Malcolm O. Sillars's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Malcolm O. Sillars · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Johnson. The network helps show where Fred Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Fred Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Fred Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1980290
2 198924
3 200412
4 19918
5
A three-valued interpretation for a relevance logic
19767
6 19896
7 19783
8 19953
9 19842
10 19932
11 19992
12 19972
13 20052
14 19942
15 19991
16
Recruiting, Retaining and Advancing Minority Employees.
19720
17 19780
18 20250
19 19760
20 20120

About Fred Johnson

Fred Johnson is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Linguistics and language evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (70 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations), Language and Linguistics (47 citations), Public Administration (11 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (36 citations). Fred Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Gerald S. Hanna, Patrick M. Wright, Alan P. Koretsky and Laxmi Iyer. Their work appears in journals such as Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, History and Philosophy of Logic, Informal Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact