Frazer Noble

463 citations
25 papers · 310 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Frazer Noble

25 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Frazer Noble
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Human-Computer Interaction 20
  • Ocean Engineering 51
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 64
  • Rehabilitation 18
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 147
Replace Hoa G. Nguyen with:
Hoa G. Nguyen United States
Woongyong Lee South Korea
Rahul Kumar Fiji
Sazali Yaacob Malaysia
Jae-Kwan Ryu South Korea
Soo-Hwan Lee South Korea
Chunran Zheng Hong Kong
Matteo-Claudio Palpacelli Italy
Frazer Noble relative to Hoa G. Nguyen United States Hoa G. Nguyen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Hoa G. Nguyen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frazer Noble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frazer Noble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frazer Noble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frazer Noble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frazer Noble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frazer Noble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frazer Noble. The network helps show where Frazer Noble may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Frazer Noble, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frazer Noble Line = papers co-authored together Frazer Noble links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201653
2 201838
3 201933
4 202027
5 201726
6 201716
7 201716
8 202313
9 201912
10 201211
11 202111
12 20179
13 20128
14 20167
15 20246
16 20226
17 20115
18 20223
19 20103
20 20082

About Frazer Noble

Frazer Noble is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering and Ocean Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies (8 papers), Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks (4 papers), Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems (3 papers), Optical Wireless Communication Technologies (2 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (2 papers), Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies (2 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (2 papers) and Wireless Power Transfer Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (20 citations), Ocean Engineering (51 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (64 citations), Rehabilitation (18 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (147 citations). Frazer Noble has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Pakistan and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Fakhrul Alam, Edmund Lai, Johan Potgieter, Khalid Mahmood Arif, A. Shaukat, Olaf Diegel, Ruili Wang, Martin M. Pike, Wei Xu and Mathew Legg. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Sensors Journal, Sensors, International Journal of Automation Technology, Nanomaterials and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact