Fraser Smith

17 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Fraser Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 119
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
  • Pharmacology 91
  • Statistics and Probability 46
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 35
Replace Lee Kaiser with:
Lee Kaiser United States
Hiroshi Yamada Japan
François Gueyffier France
Elisif Rytter Norway
Ching‐Yun Wang United States
Hans Melander Sweden
Sarah H. Chung United States
Rebecka Ernst United States
Hugo Pedder United Kingdom
Alejandra Maciel United States
Fraser Smith relative to Lee Kaiser United States Lee Kaiser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Lee Kaiser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser Smith. The network helps show where Fraser Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fraser Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fraser Smith Line = papers co-authored together Fraser Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1996231
2 199267
3 201543
4 202037
5 200123
6 197121
7 200714
8 199612
9 199611
10 19895
11 19905
12 19715
13 19694
14 20042
15 20222
16 20211
17 19971
18 20130
19
Common Paths in Medical Education: An Updated Look at the Training of Allopathic, Osteopathic, and Naturopathic Physicians.
20220
20 20250

About Fraser Smith

Fraser Smith is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Epidemiology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Genetics and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (2 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (119 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations), Pharmacology (91 citations), Statistics and Probability (46 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (35 citations). Fraser Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Sheela Talwalker, Toni M. Hoover, Keith L. Davis, David S. Knopman, S. Gracon, Lon S. Schneider, Ronald P. Strauss, Hillary L. Broder, William L. Ince and Michael M. Thomson. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal and Technometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact