Frank Steier

1.8k citations
16 papers · 240 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Frank Steier

16 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers

Frank Steier
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 84
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 121
  • Ocean Engineering 45
  • Instrumentation 9
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 18
Replace Hui‐Zong Duan with:
Hui‐Zong Duan China
D. Hoyland United Kingdom
A F García Marín Germany
Michael Perreur-Lloyd United Kingdom
Thomas S. Schwarze Germany
Henry Ward United Kingdom
Alexander R. Abramovici United States
Wolfgang Schäfer Germany
Joseph T. Williams United States
Heshan Liu China
Frank Steier relative to Hui‐Zong Duan China Hui‐Zong Duan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Hui‐Zong Duan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frank Steier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Steier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Steier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Steier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Steier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Steier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Steier. The network helps show where Frank Steier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frank Steier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frank Steier Line = papers co-authored together Frank Steier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200545
2 200634
3 201926
4 200520
5 200915
6 201814
7 201013
8 200613
9 201111
10 200710
11
Subtraction of test mass angular noise in the LISA technology package interferometer
20089
12 20098
13 20088
14 20097
15 20066
16 20061

About Frank Steier

Frank Steier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 240 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (7 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (5 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (5 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (4 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (3 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (2 papers) and Advancements in PLL and VCO Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (84 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (121 citations), Ocean Engineering (45 citations), Instrumentation (9 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (18 citations). Frank Steier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Heinzel, Karsten Danzmann, Vinzenz Wand, O. Jennrich, C. J. Killow, D. I. Robertson, Robert L. Ward, J. Hough, Claus Braxmaier and A. Monsky. Their work appears in journals such as Classical and Quantum Gravity, Applied Optics, Acta Astronautica, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement and IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact