Folkert Bode

17 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Folkert Bode
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Biochemistry 70
  • Nephrology 29
  • Oncology 104
  • Molecular Biology 258
  • Physiology 16
Replace N NAGATA with:
N NAGATA Japan
R.H. Bowman United States
N. Eleno Spain
C. Judes France
Rossella Tonelli Italy
Raffaello Roesel United States
M. Gagelmann Germany
Hans‐Paul Juretschke Germany
R C Haynes United States
Helen Bradley United Kingdom
Folkert Bode relative to N NAGATA Japan N NAGATA's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
N NAGATA · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Folkert Bode

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Folkert Bode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Folkert Bode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Folkert Bode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Folkert Bode

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Folkert Bode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Folkert Bode. The network helps show where Folkert Bode may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Folkert Bode, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Folkert Bode Line = papers co-authored together Folkert Bode links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 197092
2 198953
3 197648
4 197442
5 197042
6 197240
7 197923
8 197716
9 19759
10 19857
11 19836
12 19855
13
Reabsorption of D-glucose from various regions of the rat proximal convoluted tubule: evidence that the proximal convolution is not homogeneous.
19753
14
Quantitative studies of protein uptake in microperfused renal proximal tubules.
19772
15
Effect of parathyroid hormone on renal tubular fluid and glucose reabsorption.
19752
16
Effect of cyclic nucleotides on the isotonic fluid reabsorption in the proximal convoluted tubule of rat kidney.
19761
17 20151

About Folkert Bode

Folkert Bode is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Nephrology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (2 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (2 papers) and Barrier Structure and Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (70 citations), Nephrology (29 citations), Oncology (104 citations), Molecular Biology (258 citations) and Physiology (16 citations). Folkert Bode has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Kim Baumann, Wayne D. Frasch, Rolf K. H. Kinne, Donald F. Diedrich, Karl Baumann, Peter P. Frohnert, Rolf Kinne, R. Kinne, Raina M. Maier and C. Hornung. Their work appears in journals such as Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Kidney International, The Journal of Cell Biology and Kidney & Blood Pressure Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact