Foke van Delft
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
-
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Papers in
- Surgery 6
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments 3
- Surgical Simulation and Training 2
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment 2
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 4
- Co-authors
- Andra Neefjes‐Borst (2 shared papers)Nanne K.H. de Boer (1 shared paper)Adriaan A. van Bodegraven (1 shared paper)Evelien Dekker (2 shared papers)Siwan Thomas‐Gibson (2 shared papers)Arjun D. Koch (2 shared papers)Pietro Familiari (1 shared paper)Lucio Petruzziello (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2 papers)Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2 papers)Endoscopy (1 paper)European Radiology (1 paper)BMJ Open Gastroenterology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Foke van Delft
7 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Biotechnology 98
- Oncology 161
- Gastroenterology 14
- Surgery 79
- Physiology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Foke van Delft
This map shows the geographic impact of Foke van Delft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Foke van Delft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foke van Delft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Foke van Delft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Foke van Delft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Foke van Delft. The network helps show where Foke van Delft may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Foke van Delft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 94 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 |
About Foke van Delft
Foke van Delft is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (2 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (98 citations), Oncology (161 citations), Gastroenterology (14 citations), Surgery (79 citations) and Physiology (9 citations). Foke van Delft has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andra Neefjes‐Borst, Nanne K.H. de Boer, Adriaan A. van Bodegraven, Evelien Dekker, Siwan Thomas‐Gibson, Arjun D. Koch, Pietro Familiari, Lucio Petruzziello, Jelle Haringsma and Adam Haycock. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Endoscopy, European Radiology and BMJ Open Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.