Flávia Rocha

26 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

Flávia Rocha
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Endocrinology 327
  • Clinical Biochemistry 112
  • Small Animals 97
  • Microbiology 4
  • Epidemiology 163
Replace Anne Cybelle Pinto with:
Anne Cybelle Pinto Brazil
Max Aravena-Román Australia
Kathryn H. Engler United Kingdom
Annick Carmi–Leroy France
Vishnu Chaturvedi United States
Connie Fe C. Gibas United States
William Lainhart United States
Mindy B. Glass United States
Kalliopi Georgiades France
Hanneke A. de Valk Netherlands
Flávia Rocha relative to Anne Cybelle Pinto Brazil Anne Cybelle Pinto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Anne Cybelle Pinto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Flávia Rocha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flávia Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flávia Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flávia Rocha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flávia Rocha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flávia Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flávia Rocha. The network helps show where Flávia Rocha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Flávia Rocha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Flávia Rocha Line = papers co-authored together Flávia Rocha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012131
2 2013101
3 201754
4 201048
5 201244
6 202138
7 201234
8 201430
9 202129
10 201421
11 201219
12 201217
13 201217
14 201216
15 201611
16 20187
17 20066
18 20175
19 20154
20 20164

About Flávia Rocha

Flávia Rocha is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Clinical Biochemistry, Epidemiology, Small Animals and Microbiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (18 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (14 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (4 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (1 paper) and Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (327 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (112 citations), Small Animals (97 citations), Microbiology (4 citations) and Epidemiology (163 citations). Flávia Rocha has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vasco Azevedo, Siomar de Castro Soares, Ulisses de Pádua Pereira, Fernanda Alves Dorella, Henrique César Pereira Figueiredo, Leandro Benevides, Artur Luiz da Costa da Silva, Letícia de Castro Oliveira, Debmalya Barh and Anderson Miyoshi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, BMC Genomics, PLoS ONE, Integrative Biology and Frontiers in Forests and Global Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact