Flávia Pinto

809 citations
10 papers · 531 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Soil Science top 10%
    • Soil erosion and sediment transport
    • Soil Management and Crop Yield
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
    • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Papers in

Flávia Pinto

9 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Flávia Pinto
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Soil Science 125
  • Global and Planetary Change 235
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 116
  • Forestry 35
  • Ecology 163
Replace Matthew G. Hohmann with:
Matthew G. Hohmann United States
Adam Dixon United States
Nino Tavares Amazonas Brazil
Dora M. Villela Brazil
Ethan Householder Germany
Carla Nogueira Portugal
Ariuntsetseg Lkhagva Mongolia
Diana R. Lane United States
Juliana Silveira dos Santos Brazil
Terrell T. Baker United States
Flávia Pinto relative to Matthew G. Hohmann United States Matthew G. Hohmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Matthew G. Hohmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Flávia Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flávia Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flávia Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flávia Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flávia Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flávia Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flávia Pinto. The network helps show where Flávia Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Flávia Pinto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Flávia Pinto Line = papers co-authored together Flávia Pinto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2005268
2
The Lavrados of Roraima: Biodiversity and Conservation of Brazil's Amazonian Savannas
2007115
3 201878
4 201346
5 201510
6 20209
7 20043
8 20191
9 20221
10 20000

About Flávia Pinto

Flávia Pinto is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling and Soil Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (2 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (125 citations), Global and Planetary Change (235 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (116 citations), Forestry (35 citations) and Ecology (163 citations). Flávia Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luciano Mendes Bezerra, Rafael S. Oliveira, Adriana Gonçalves Moreira, Daniel C. Nepstad, Eric A. Davidson, Carlos Augusto Klink, Reinaldo Imbrózio Barbosa, Philip M. Fearnside, Laerte Guimarães Ferreira and Leandro Baumgarten. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing, Functional Ecology, Journal of Biogeography, Expert Systems with Applications and Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact