F.J. Ritter

1.4k citations
40 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 13
    • Insect Pheromone Research and Control 10
    • Insect and Pesticide Research 6
    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 4

F.J. Ritter

38 papers receiving 847 citations

Peers

F.J. Ritter
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Insect Science 388
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 307
  • Genetics 334
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 125
  • Spectroscopy 135
Replace H. A. Lloyd with:
H. A. Lloyd United States
J. P. Minyard United States
Tatsuji Chuman Japan
G. W. K. Cavill Australia
J. B. Siddall United States
Wilfried A. K�nig Germany
P. E. J. Verwiel Netherlands
M. N. Galbraith Australia
Warren Steck Canada
Clive A. Henrick United States
F.J. Ritter relative to H. A. Lloyd United States H. A. Lloyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
H. A. Lloyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F.J. Ritter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.J. Ritter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.J. Ritter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.J. Ritter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.J. Ritter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.J. Ritter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.J. Ritter. The network helps show where F.J. Ritter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F.J. Ritter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F.J. Ritter Line = papers co-authored together F.J. Ritter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973108
2 197765
3 196263
4 197262
5 198061
6 197455
7 197649
8 197648
9 197947
10 197346
11 198237
12 199037
13 197435
14 197834
15 196332
16 197027
17 197725
18 196920
19 197417
20 197214

About F.J. Ritter

F.J. Ritter is a scholar working on Genetics, Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Spectroscopy and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (10 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (9 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (388 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (307 citations), Genetics (334 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (125 citations) and Spectroscopy (135 citations). F.J. Ritter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include C. J. Persoons, P. E. J. Verwiel, Eduard G. Talman, A. K. Minks, S. Voerman, W.J. Nooyen, Wendell L. Roelofs, Frank Stein, F. Geiss and Tanetoshi Koyama. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Tetrahedron Letters, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Nature and Journal of Chemical Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact