Filip Španiel
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 26
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 21
- Co-authors
- Jiřı́ Horáček (29 shared papers)Cyril Höschl (22 shared papers)Tomáš Novák (15 shared papers)Tomáš Hájek (18 shared papers)Pavel Mohr (10 shared papers)Lucie Bankovská Motlová (11 shared papers)Iveta Fajnerová (7 shared papers)Jaroslav Tintěra (13 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Filip Španiel
74 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Psychiatry and Mental health 427
- Cognitive Neuroscience 604
- Applied Psychology 134
- Biological Psychiatry 58
- Neurology 160
Countries citing papers authored by Filip Španiel
This map shows the geographic impact of Filip Španiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Filip Španiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Filip Španiel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Filip Španiel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Filip Španiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Filip Španiel. The network helps show where Filip Španiel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Filip Španiel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 108 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 96 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 87 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 69 | |
| 7 | The double-blind sham-controlled study of high-frequency rTMS (20 Hz) for negative symptoms in schizophrenia: negative results. | 2007 | 62 |
| 8 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 49 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 29 |
About Filip Španiel
Filip Španiel is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Neurology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (26 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (21 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (427 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (604 citations), Applied Psychology (134 citations), Biological Psychiatry (58 citations) and Neurology (160 citations). Filip Španiel has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jiřı́ Horáček, Cyril Höschl, Tomáš Novák, Tomáš Hájek, Pavel Mohr, Lucie Bankovská Motlová, Iveta Fajnerová, Jaroslav Tintěra, Martin Matějka and Jaroslav Hlinka. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience and BMC Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.