Fernando Preto

1.6k citations
45 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Preto

42 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Fernando Preto
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.0k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 136
  • Pollution 117
  • Mechanical Engineering 360
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 58
Replace J. L. T. Azevedo with:
J. L. T. Azevedo Portugal
Jaap Koppejan Netherlands
J. Zuwała Poland
Jean-Michel Commandré France
Janusz Lasek Poland
David A. Tillman United States
D. McIlveen‐Wright United Kingdom
Kai Sipilä Finland
Antonio Gutiérrez Lavín Spain
Won Yang South Korea
Fernando Preto relative to J. L. T. Azevedo Portugal J. L. T. Azevedo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
J. L. T. Azevedo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Preto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Preto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Preto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Preto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Preto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Preto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Preto. The network helps show where Fernando Preto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Preto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Preto Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Preto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013259
2 2012152
3 2008133
4 201270
5 201258
6 200855
7 200747
8 201147
9 201437
10 201035
11 199933
12 200933
13 199930
14 201130
15
Biomass Densification for Energy Production
201129
16 201127
17 200926
18 201823
19
Biomass Burn Characteristics
201123
20 199822

About Fernando Preto

Fernando Preto is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Computational Mechanics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (34 papers), Coal and Its By-products (11 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (9 papers), Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing (7 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (6 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (4 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (4 papers) and Fire dynamics and safety research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (1.0k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (136 citations), Pollution (117 citations), Mechanical Engineering (360 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (58 citations). Fernando Preto has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Douglas C. Elliott, Jinsheng Wang, Anja Oasmaa, Dietrich Meier, A.V. Bridgwater, Chunbao Xu, Yuanyuan Shao, Bert van de Beld, Jesse Zhu and Shahab Sokhansanj. Their work appears in journals such as Energy & Fuels, Biomass and Bioenergy, Fuel, Applied Energy and The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact