Fernando Joner

24 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Fernando Joner
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 397
  • Ecological Modeling 119
  • Horticulture 17
  • Forestry 64
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 279
Replace Gumersindo Sánchez‐Montoya with:
Gumersindo Sánchez‐Montoya Mexico
Pavel Dodonov Brazil
Jhonathan O. Silva Brazil
Numa P. Pavón Mexico
Leonel López-Toledo Mexico
Fred W. Stauffer Switzerland
Bénédicte Bachelot United States
Michèle Bozzano Italy
Marc Parren Netherlands
Felipe Martello Brazil
Fernando Joner relative to Gumersindo Sánchez‐Montoya Mexico Gumersindo Sánchez‐Montoya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Gumersindo Sánchez‐Montoya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Joner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Joner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Joner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Joner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Joner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Joner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Joner. The network helps show where Fernando Joner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Joner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Joner Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Joner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013189
2 2009137
3 201379
4 200743
5 202237
6 202127
7 201126
8 202222
9 201420
10 201117
11 202112
12 201212
13 202011
14 200711
15 20219
16 20196
17 20233
18 20243
19
Análise do Potencial Regenerativo in vitro de Diferentes Cultivares de Feijão-Caupi
20082
20 20251

About Fernando Joner

Fernando Joner is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (4 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (3 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (397 citations), Ecological Modeling (119 citations), Horticulture (17 citations), Forestry (64 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (279 citations). Fernando Joner has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Valério D. Pillar, Leandro Duarte, Ênio Sosinski, Sandra Cristina Müller, C. Blanco, Carlos Roberto Fonseca, Ilyas Siddique, Luciana Regina Podgaiski, Milton de Souza Mendonça and Marco Moretti. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vegetation Science, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Austral Ecology, Journal of Applied Ecology and Restoration Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact