Fernanda Daniel

66 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Fernanda Daniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 28
  • Health 52
  • Demography 52
  • General Health Professions 88
  • Gender Studies 35
Replace Gemma Wilson with:
Gemma Wilson United Kingdom
Laurie A. Roades United States
Noreen Orr United Kingdom
Judith A. Waters United States
Jungsu Ryu United States
Areum Han United States
Alyssa W. Goldman United States
Rudolf J. Bosscher Netherlands
Daniela Weber Austria
Michael A. Garcia United States
Fernanda Daniel relative to Gemma Wilson United Kingdom Gemma Wilson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Gemma Wilson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernanda Daniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernanda Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernanda Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernanda Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernanda Daniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernanda Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernanda Daniel. The network helps show where Fernanda Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Fernanda Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernanda Daniel Line = papers co-authored together Fernanda Daniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015101
2 201739
3 201831
4 201525
5 201722
6 201815
7 201814
8 201913
9
Ana Alexandre Fernandes. 1999 (reimpressão da 1a ed. 1997). Velhice e Sociedade: Demografia, Família e Políticas Sociais em Portugal. Oeiras: Celta.
200112
10 201911
11 201611
12 201611
13 201910
14 20159
15 20189
16 20168
17 20157
18 20196
19 20186
20 20236

About Fernanda Daniel

Fernanda Daniel is a scholar working on Health, Demography, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 74 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (12 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (10 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (7 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (6 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), History, Culture, and Society (4 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (28 citations), Health (52 citations), Demography (52 citations), General Health Professions (88 citations) and Gender Studies (35 citations). Fernanda Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Poland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Helena Espírito‐Santo, Inês Amaral, Alexandre Silva, Rachel L. Fazio, Pedro Lopes Ferreira, Prof. Dr. Elsa Caetano, M. Marques, Ilda Massano‐Cardoso, Jeroen Dikken and Sónia Catarina Carvalho Simões. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Aging & Mental Health and Heliyon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact