Ferdinando Galassi

571 citations
13 papers · 396 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Ferdinando Galassi

11 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Ferdinando Galassi
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Clinical Psychology 190
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 129
  • Cultural Studies 77
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
  • Applied Psychology 29
Replace Hermann Staats with:
Hermann Staats Germany
Thorsten Jakobsen Germany
Raluca A. Topciu United States
Bernhard Strauß Germany
Lionel Cailhol France
Mark Warner United States
Tanya L. Hopwood Australia
Minh Tran United States
Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz Germany
Matteo Innocenti Italy
Ferdinando Galassi relative to Hermann Staats Germany Hermann Staats's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Hermann Staats · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ferdinando Galassi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ferdinando Galassi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferdinando Galassi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferdinando Galassi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ferdinando Galassi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ferdinando Galassi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ferdinando Galassi. The network helps show where Ferdinando Galassi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ferdinando Galassi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ferdinando Galassi Line = papers co-authored together Ferdinando Galassi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1997234
2 202176
3 200724
4 200223
5 202222
6 20109
7 19984
8 20221
9 20251
10 20211
11 20211
12 20210
13
[Nosographic and psychodynamic problems of autoeviration. Presentation of 5 cases].
19890

About Ferdinando Galassi

Ferdinando Galassi is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (190 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (129 citations), Cultural Studies (77 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (90 citations) and Applied Psychology (29 citations). Ferdinando Galassi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Canada and Armenia. Frequent co-authors include P. L. Cabras, Carlo Faravelli, Valdo Ricca, Matteo Innocenti, Giovanni Castellini, Valentina Niccolai, Simone Toccafondi, Alberto Conti, Pier Luigi Cabras and Edoardo Mannucci. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Clinics in Dermatology, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Psychopathology and American Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact