Feng-Wei Chen
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Papers in
-
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 7
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 2
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 8
- Co-authors
- Yu-Xiao Liu (8 shared papers)Shao-Wen Wei (2 shared papers)Heng Guo (3 shared papers)Ya‐Ling Hsu (4 shared papers)Po‐Lin Kuo (4 shared papers)Haitao Li (1 shared paper)Zhen‐Hua Zhao (2 shared papers)Xiangnan Zhou (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of High Energy Physics (2 papers)Oncotarget (2 papers)The European Physical Journal C (1 paper)International Journal of Oncology (1 paper)Cancer Cell International (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ChinaTaiwanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Feng-Wei Chen
13 papers receiving 414 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 186
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 186
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 80
- Cancer Research 71
- Molecular Biology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Feng-Wei Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Feng-Wei Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng-Wei Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng-Wei Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Feng-Wei Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng-Wei Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng-Wei Chen. The network helps show where Feng-Wei Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng-Wei Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 100 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 4 |
About Feng-Wei Chen
Feng-Wei Chen is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Molecular Biology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (8 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (7 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (2 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (1 paper), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (1 paper) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (186 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (186 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (80 citations), Cancer Research (71 citations) and Molecular Biology (101 citations). Feng-Wei Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yu-Xiao Liu, Shao-Wen Wei, Heng Guo, Ya‐Ling Hsu, Po‐Lin Kuo, Haitao Li, Zhen‐Hua Zhao, Xiangnan Zhou, Inn‐Wen Chong and Wei‐An Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Oncotarget, The European Physical Journal C, International Journal of Oncology and Cancer Cell International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.