Feng Wen

1.7k citations
192 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Feng Wen

160 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Feng Wen
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 750
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 374
  • Computer Networks and Communications 241
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 48
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 93
Replace S. V. Hattangady with:
S. V. Hattangady United States
Hua Zhou China
Yoshinori Takeuchi Japan
Patrick Lysaght United States
Jian‐Qiang Lu United States
Zhaoming Lu China
Ying Wang China
Aihua Wang China
Yibiao Yang China
K. A. Jose United States
Feng Wen relative to S. V. Hattangady United States S. V. Hattangady's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.3×
S. V. Hattangady · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Wen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Wen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Wen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Wen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Wen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Wen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Wen. The network helps show where Feng Wen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng Wen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Wen Line = papers co-authored together Feng Wen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 192 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013122
2 200866
3 199960
4 201657
5 200245
6 202134
7 201729
8 202029
9 202228
10 201823
11 202223
12 201720
13 202119
14 200619
15 201617
16 202117
17 202217
18 200217
19 200316
20 201915

About Feng Wen

Feng Wen is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 192 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Network Technologies (86 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (56 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (46 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (45 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (17 papers), Advanced Optical Network Technologies (15 papers), Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (13 papers) and Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (750 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (374 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (241 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (48 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (93 citations). Feng Wen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Branka Vucetic, Jinhong Yuan, Baojian Wu, Kun Qiu, Kun Qiu, Min Chen, Hai Jin, Fangming Liu, Peng Shu and Bo Li. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Communications, Optics Express, Chinese Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Optical Fiber Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact