Feng Su

2.1k citations
71 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Feng Su

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Feng Su
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Inorganic Chemistry 376
  • Cancer Research 295
  • Organic Chemistry 458
  • Oncology 219
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 159
Replace Yongmei Zhao with:
Yongmei Zhao China
Kazuko Matsumoto Japan
Sounik Saha India
Zhen Lei China
Pengfei Shi China
Zhenwei Zhang China
Ning Zhao China
Juan C. Frías Spain
Brenda L. Sánchez-Gaytán Mexico
Clive Yik‐Sham Chung Hong Kong
Feng Su relative to Yongmei Zhao China Yongmei Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Yongmei Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Su

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Su's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Su with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Su more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Su

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Su. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Su. The network helps show where Feng Su may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng Su, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Su Line = papers co-authored together Feng Su links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018312
2 2019124
3 201977
4 201860
5 201857
6 201352
7 201947
8 201546
9 201841
10 201539
11 201938
12 201736
13 201436
14 202232
15 201631
16 201930
17 202130
18 201526
19 201724
20 201824

About Feng Su

Feng Su is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (29 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (20 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (13 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (7 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (7 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (6 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (4 papers) and Advancements in Battery Materials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (376 citations), Cancer Research (295 citations), Organic Chemistry (458 citations), Oncology (219 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (159 citations). Feng Su has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hui‐Jun Zhang, Ting‐Bin Wen, Weidong Lin, Liping Lu, Sisi Feng, Miaoli Zhu, Tianxin Lin, Changhao Chen, Junming Bi and Wang He. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section C Structural Chemistry, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Dalton Transactions, CrystEngComm and Cell Death and Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact