Feng Su

2.1k citations
70 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Feng Su

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Feng Su
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Inorganic Chemistry 372
  • Cancer Research 335
  • Organic Chemistry 451
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 160
  • Oncology 236
Replace Yongmei Zhao with:
Yongmei Zhao China
Sounik Saha India
Kunio Matsumoto Japan
Pascale Lemoine France
Zhenwei Zhang China
Pengfei Shi China
Zhen Lei China
Ning Zhao China
Juan C. Frías Spain
Clive Yik‐Sham Chung Hong Kong
Feng Su relative to Yongmei Zhao China Yongmei Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Yongmei Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Su

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Su's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Su with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Su more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Su

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Su. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Su. The network helps show where Feng Su may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng Su, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Su Line = papers co-authored together Feng Su links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018306
2 2019121
3 201976
4 201860
5 201855
6 201352
7 201546
8 201945
9 201841
10 201539
11 201937
12 201435
13 201735
14 202231
15 201631
16 201930
17 202130
18 201526
19 201823
20 201723

About Feng Su

Feng Su is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (29 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (20 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (13 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (7 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (7 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (7 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers) and Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (372 citations), Cancer Research (335 citations), Organic Chemistry (451 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (160 citations) and Oncology (236 citations). Feng Su has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hui‐Jun Zhang, Ting‐Bin Wen, Weidong Lin, Liping Lu, Sisi Feng, Miaoli Zhu, Junming Bi, Changhao Chen, Wang He and Yue Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section C Structural Chemistry, Dalton Transactions, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and CrystEngComm.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact