Feng Geng

1.0k citations
75 papers · 773 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Feng Geng

72 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers

Feng Geng
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 121
  • Computational Mechanics 294
  • Biomedical Engineering 372
  • Ceramics and Composites 40
  • Ophthalmology 39
Replace Yuhao Lei with:
Yuhao Lei United Kingdom
Xinxiang Miao China
Francesco P. Mezzapesa Italy
Zhichao Liu China
Mahmoud Mollabashi Iran
Anna Sytchkova Italy
P. Pánek Poland
Judit Budai Hungary
K. Dickmann Germany
Pavel Bulkin France
Feng Geng relative to Yuhao Lei United Kingdom Yuhao Lei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×48×
Yuhao Lei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Geng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Geng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Geng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Geng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Geng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Geng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Geng. The network helps show where Feng Geng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng Geng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Geng Line = papers co-authored together Feng Geng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201376
2 201558
3 201649
4 202347
5 201736
6 202235
7 201633
8 202328
9 202327
10 201222
11 201720
12 201919
13 202319
14 201519
15 201517
16 201815
17 202314
18 200513
19 201812
20 201311

About Feng Geng

Feng Geng is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 75 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (31 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (17 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (14 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (14 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (11 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (9 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (8 papers) and Optical Coatings and Gratings (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surfaces, Coatings and Films (121 citations), Computational Mechanics (294 citations), Biomedical Engineering (372 citations), Ceramics and Composites (40 citations) and Ophthalmology (39 citations). Feng Geng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Jin Huang, Xin Ye, Wanguo Zheng, Weidong Wu, Qiao Xu, Laixi Sun, Zhichao Liu, Jian Cheng, Xiaodong Jiang and Linjie Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optics & Laser Technology, Scientific Reports, Applied Surface Science and Marine and Petroleum Geology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact