Felix Geist

458 citations
11 papers · 289 · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Nephrology top 10%
    • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
    • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
    • Respiratory viral infections research
    • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
    • Influenza Virus Research Studies

Papers in

Felix Geist

11 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Felix Geist
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Nephrology 75
  • Epidemiology 109
  • Cell Biology 41
  • Infectious Diseases 36
  • Physiology 7
Replace Sandrine Delbauve with:
Sandrine Delbauve Belgium
Yi-Jiao Huang China
Zhidan Xiang China
Geli Zhu China
Jhung W. Jhung United States
Sagar Paudel United States
Sonia Q. Doi United States
Gamal Hassoun Israel
Daniel Pineda‐Tenor Spain
Sandro Lindig Germany
Felix Geist relative to Sandrine Delbauve Belgium Sandrine Delbauve's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Sandrine Delbauve · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felix Geist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Geist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Geist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Geist. The network helps show where Felix Geist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Felix Geist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felix Geist Line = papers co-authored together Felix Geist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2013105
2 199177
3 198755
4 201835
5 20244
6 20214
7 20243
8 20242
9 20252
10 20241
11 19851

About Felix Geist

Felix Geist is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Epidemiology, Cancer Research and Infectious Diseases, having authored 11 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory viral infections research (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (2 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (2 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (2 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers) and Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (75 citations), Epidemiology (109 citations), Cell Biology (41 citations), Infectious Diseases (36 citations) and Physiology (7 citations). Felix Geist has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Frederick G. Hayden, Tobias B. Huber, Dontscho Kerjaschki, Christoph Schell, Björn Hartleben, Shuya Liu, Gerd Walz, Frederick G. Hayden, Oliver Kretz and Wibke Bechtel‐Walz. Their work appears in journals such as Neoplasia, iScience, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Developmental Cell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact