Felix Bach
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Pain Management and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Research Data Management Practices 8
-
- Scientific Computing and Data Management 8
- Co-authors
- H. Maaß (9 shared papers)Hüseyin Çakmak (11 shared papers)Herta Flor (5 shared papers)Martin Diers (5 shared papers)Sandra Kamping (4 shared papers)Robin Bekrater‐Bodmann (4 shared papers)Xaver Fuchs (4 shared papers)Mariela Rance (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2 papers)Brain Research (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Behavior Research Methods (1 paper)ZooKeys (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Felix Bach
23 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Human-Computer Interaction 71
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 42
- Rehabilitation 51
- Information Systems and Management 39
- Cognitive Neuroscience 68
Countries citing papers authored by Felix Bach
This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Bach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Bach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Bach. The network helps show where Felix Bach may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Felix Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 1 |
About Felix Bach
Felix Bach is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research Data Management Practices (8 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (8 papers), Computational Physics and Python Applications (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (71 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (42 citations), Rehabilitation (51 citations), Information Systems and Management (39 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations). Felix Bach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H. Maaß, Hüseyin Çakmak, Herta Flor, Martin Diers, Sandra Kamping, Robin Bekrater‐Bodmann, Xaver Fuchs, Mariela Rance, Jens Foell and Jörg Trojan. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Brain Research, PLoS ONE, Behavior Research Methods and ZooKeys.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.