Feiling Yang

716 citations
39 papers · 548 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Feiling Yang

32 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Feiling Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecological Modeling 98
  • Global and Planetary Change 337
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 127
  • Ecology 186
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 62
Replace Wenjing Xu with:
Wenjing Xu United States
Ruppert Vimal France
Stella Manes Brazil
Mingchang Cao China
Mike Harley United Kingdom
Jacqueline de Chazal Australia
Sebataolo Rahlao South Africa
Gérard Imani Democratic Republic of the Congo
Paulo Flores Ribeiro Portugal
Geoffrey M. Kay Australia
Feiling Yang relative to Wenjing Xu United States Wenjing Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Wenjing Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feiling Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feiling Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feiling Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feiling Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feiling Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feiling Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feiling Yang. The network helps show where Feiling Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feiling Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feiling Yang Line = papers co-authored together Feiling Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017120
2 201957
3 201953
4 201938
5 201636
6 201831
7 201927
8 202318
9 201618
10 202116
11 201916
12 201816
13 201114
14 202310
15 20229
16 20239
17 20257
18 20177
19 20215
20 20235

About Feiling Yang

Feiling Yang is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (14 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (98 citations), Global and Planetary Change (337 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (127 citations), Ecology (186 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (62 citations). Feiling Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ruidong Wu, Junjun Wang, Wei Wu, Shiwei Lin, Jinming Hu, Haiwei Zhao, Yang Guo, Jianzhong Ma, Tong Jin and Yongcheng Long. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Journal of Environmental Management, Ecological Indicators, Scientific Reports and Conservation Science and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact