Feiling Yang

615 citations
33 papers · 474 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Feiling Yang

26 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Feiling Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Ecological Modeling 93
  • Global and Planetary Change 315
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 122
  • Ecology 168
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 60
Replace Henrike Schulte to Bühne with:
Henrike Schulte to Bühne United Kingdom
Fabio Berzaghi United States
Jacqueline de Chazal Australia
Mingchang Cao China
Pramod Lamsal Australia
Elena Bukvareva Russia
Ouyang Zhi China
Geoffrey M. Kay Australia
S. Vazeed Pasha India
Feiling Yang relative to Henrike Schulte to Bühne United Kingdom Henrike Schulte to Bühne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Henrike Schulte to Bühne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feiling Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feiling Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feiling Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feiling Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feiling Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feiling Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feiling Yang. The network helps show where Feiling Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feiling Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feiling Yang Line = papers co-authored together Feiling Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017115
2 201957
3 201950
4 201935
5 201632
6 201827
7 201925
8 201617
9 201816
10 201915
11 202314
12 202114
13 20238
14 20227
15 20236
16 20215
17 20215
18 20215
19 20244
20
Identifying plant priority conservation areas based on the NPWP distribution in Yunnan, China
20134

About Feiling Yang

Feiling Yang is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (12 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (93 citations), Global and Planetary Change (315 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (122 citations), Ecology (168 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (60 citations). Feiling Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ruidong Wu, Junjun Wang, Wei Wu, Jinming Hu, Haiwei Zhao, Yang Guo, Tong Jin, Jianzhong Ma, Yongcheng Long and Jian Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Scientific Reports, Ecological Indicators, Journal of Environmental Management and Conservation Science and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact