Federica Sciacca

594 citations
25 papers · 421 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Federica Sciacca

24 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Federica Sciacca
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Psychology 46
  • Clinical Psychology 112
  • Sociology and Political Science 228
  • Education 108
  • Transplantation 8
Replace Didem Coşkun Şimşek with:
Didem Coşkun Şimşek Türkiye
Blossom Fernandes United Kingdom
Chunyong Yuan China
Ivone Patrão Portugal
Shari R. Reiter United States
Çiğdem Berber Çelik Türkiye
Shanelle Mariah Briggs United States
Fangfang Wen China
A. Aykut Ceyhan Türkiye
Juan Hou China
Federica Sciacca relative to Didem Coşkun Şimşek Türkiye Didem Coşkun Şimşek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Didem Coşkun Şimşek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Federica Sciacca

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federica Sciacca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federica Sciacca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federica Sciacca more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federica Sciacca

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federica Sciacca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federica Sciacca. The network helps show where Federica Sciacca may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Federica Sciacca, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Federica Sciacca Line = papers co-authored together Federica Sciacca links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201793
2 202046
3 201840
4 202133
5 202132
6 201528
7 201823
8 202122
9 202216
10 202113
11 202113
12 201610
13
Personality and dissociative experiences in smartphone users
20198
14 20227
15 20226
16 20226
17 20195
18 20204
19 19913
20 20203

About Federica Sciacca

Federica Sciacca is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Education, having authored 25 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (46 citations), Clinical Psychology (112 citations), Sociology and Political Science (228 citations), Education (108 citations) and Transplantation (8 citations). Federica Sciacca has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Concetta De Pasquale, Zira Hichy, Valentina Martinelli, Matteo Chiappedi, Maria Luisa Pistorio, Santo Di Nuovo, Daniela Conti, Margherita Spagnuolo Lobb, Giorgio Basile and Alessia Giaquinta. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Data in Brief, Heliyon and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact