F.D. Shaw
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 1%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Small Animals top 1%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Animal health and immunology
Papers in
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 22
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 10
- Veterinary Medicine and Surgery 2
- Co-authors
- Ronald Keith Tume (2 shared papers)P. E. Bouton (4 shared papers)P. V. HARRIS (2 shared papers)D. Morton (1 shared paper)F.M. Clarke (1 shared paper)Peter Toscas (1 shared paper)S.L. Beilken (1 shared paper)D. J. Walker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Meat Science (8 papers)Australian Veterinary Journal (6 papers)Journal of Food Science (3 papers)Research in Veterinary Science (3 papers)New Zealand Veterinary Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
F.D. Shaw
30 papers receiving 675 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Animal Science and Zoology 462
- Small Animals 244
- Agronomy and Crop Science 63
- Equine 7
- Biotechnology 8
Countries citing papers authored by F.D. Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of F.D. Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.D. Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.D. Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F.D. Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.D. Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.D. Shaw. The network helps show where F.D. Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside F.D. Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 109 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 79 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 66 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 59 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 59 | |
| 6 | 1977 | 40 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 24 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 23 | |
| 16 | 1976 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 11 |
About F.D. Shaw
F.D. Shaw is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Equine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 783 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (22 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Halal products and consumer behavior (3 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (2 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (1 paper) and Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (462 citations), Small Animals (244 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (63 citations), Equine (7 citations) and Biotechnology (8 citations). F.D. Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Keith Tume, P. E. Bouton, P. V. HARRIS, D. Morton, F.M. Clarke, Peter Toscas, S.L. Beilken, D. J. Walker, Drewe M. Ferguson and Carrick Erskine Devine. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Australian Veterinary Journal, Journal of Food Science, Research in Veterinary Science and New Zealand Veterinary Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.