Fannie M. Singleton

9 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Fannie M. Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 180
  • Physiology 73
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 299
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 41
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 42
Replace Artur Szkotak with:
Artur Szkotak Canada
J. I. Isenberg United States
Michelle Trusgnich United States
Margarita Fuhrmann Germany
Judith S. Grunstein United States
Clara Ledoussal United States
Deborah A. Keeton United States
Lynda Ruffini United States
Wenxiao Wu China
Fannie M. Singleton relative to Artur Szkotak Canada Artur Szkotak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Artur Szkotak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fannie M. Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fannie M. Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fannie M. Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fannie M. Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fannie M. Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fannie M. Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fannie M. Singleton. The network helps show where Fannie M. Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Fannie M. Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fannie M. Singleton Line = papers co-authored together Fannie M. Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1987182
2 198770
3 198649
4 199043
5 199326
6 198921
7 198818
8 198917
9 19867

About Fannie M. Singleton

Fannie M. Singleton is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (5 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (5 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (180 citations), Physiology (73 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (299 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (41 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (42 citations). Fannie M. Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ward R. Rice, J. A. Whitsett, G F Ross, Sharon Dingle, Michael J. Linke and Peter D. Walzer. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Journal of Applied Physiology, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research and Biochemical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact