Fahmida Smith

524 citations
9 papers · 439 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Fahmida Smith

8 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Fahmida Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 242
  • Catalysis 124
  • Materials Chemistry 346
  • Automotive Engineering 51
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 136
Replace Yevgeniy Klochko with:
Yevgeniy Klochko South Africa
Dana Swanepoel South Africa
Stanford Chidziva South Africa
Michael Geißelbrecht Germany
Sayantan Jana India
M. G. McKellar United States
Konrad Motyliński Poland
Omid Babaie Rizvandi Denmark
Robert Deja Germany
Van Nhu Nguyen Germany
Fahmida Smith relative to Yevgeniy Klochko South Africa Yevgeniy Klochko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Yevgeniy Klochko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fahmida Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fahmida Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fahmida Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fahmida Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fahmida Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fahmida Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fahmida Smith. The network helps show where Fahmida Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fahmida Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fahmida Smith Line = papers co-authored together Fahmida Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2015124
2 2016117
3 201669
4 202153
5 201942
6 201530
7 19513
8
Metal Hydride Hydrogen Storage and Supply Systems for Electric Forklift with LT PEMFC Power Module
20151
9
A Novel Power Generation System Based on Combination of Hydrogen and Direct Carbon Fuel Cells for Decentralized Applications
20100

About Fahmida Smith

Fahmida Smith is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Automotive Engineering and Catalysis, having authored 9 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrogen Storage and Materials (7 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (7 papers), Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (4 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (2 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (1 paper), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (1 paper), Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction (1 paper) and Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Energy Engineering and Power Technology (242 citations), Catalysis (124 citations), Materials Chemistry (346 citations), Automotive Engineering (51 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (136 citations). Fahmida Smith has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Croatia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Mykhaylo Lototskyy, Ivan Tolj, Moegamat Wafeeq Davids, Dana Swanepoel, Bruno G. Pollet, Vladimir Linkov, Yevgeniy Klochko, A W Parsons, Cordellia Sita and Stanford Chidziva. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Journal of Power Sources, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, PubMed and JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact