F. Ted Hebert

18 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

F. Ted Hebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Public Administration 205
  • Political Science and International Relations 151
  • Management Information Systems 50
  • Strategy and Management 80
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 47
Replace Ray Fells with:
Ray Fells Australia
Carolyn Ban United States
David H. Rosenbloom United States
Mary Bryna Sanger United States
Brian J. Reed United States
Janet Coble Vinzant United States
Alisa Hicklin United States
Stephen Woodland United Kingdom
Kazuo Koike Japan
Thomas Pallesen Denmark
F. Ted Hebert relative to Ray Fells Australia Ray Fells's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Ray Fells · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Ted Hebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Ted Hebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Ted Hebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Ted Hebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Ted Hebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Ted Hebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Ted Hebert. The network helps show where F. Ted Hebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside F. Ted Hebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Ted Hebert Line = papers co-authored together F. Ted Hebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1999164
2 198765
3 200062
4 199832
5 198322
6 199519
7
Undergraduate Physical Education Teacher Preparation: What Practitioners Tell Us
200416
8
The politics of raising State and local revenue
197815
9 19739
10 19929
11 19987
12 19935
13 19853
14 19852
15 19772
16 19871
17 19881
18 19971
19 19770
20 20020

About F. Ted Hebert

F. Ted Hebert is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Education and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 20 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (1 paper), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper), Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (1 paper), Innovative Teaching Methods (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (205 citations), Political Science and International Relations (151 citations), Management Information Systems (50 citations), Strategy and Management (80 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (47 citations). F. Ted Hebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey L. Brudney, Deil S. Wright, Dominic S. Wright, Douglas H. Collier, Richard D. Bingham, David R. Morgan, Robert E. England, David B. Walker and Paul E. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Public Affairs Education and The American Review of Public Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact