F. Raja

8 papers receiving 1.2k citations

F. Raja's Hit Papers

Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up 2013 · 817 citations
8170+4+8Years since publication250500750

Peers

F. Raja
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Reproductive Medicine 622
  • Oncology 399
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 98
  • Cancer Research 119
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 100
Replace Eleftherios Pierre Samartzis with:
Eleftherios Pierre Samartzis Switzerland
Masanori Kanemura Japan
Matin Sheriff United Kingdom
Synnöve Staff Finland
Katherine C. Kurnit United States
Yoshimichi Tanaka Japan
Tomohito Tanaka Japan
Eleonora Ghisoni Italy
Alexandre André Balieiro Anastácio da Costa Brazil
Natalie Y.L. Ngoi Singapore
F. Raja relative to Eleftherios Pierre Samartzis Switzerland Eleftherios Pierre Samartzis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Eleftherios Pierre Samartzis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Raja

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Raja's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Raja with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Raja more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Raja

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Raja. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Raja. The network helps show where F. Raja may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Raja, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Raja Line = papers co-authored together F. Raja links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Hit paper breakdown →
2013817
2 2012108
3 2018105
4 201467
5 201364
6 201154
7 20126
8 20201
9 20240
10 20240
11 20160

About F. Raja

F. Raja is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research and Surgery, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (1 paper), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (1 paper), S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (622 citations), Oncology (399 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (98 citations), Cancer Research (119 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (100 citations). F. Raja has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan A. Ledermann, Antonio González-Martı́n, Christina Fotopoulou, Nicoletta Colombo, Cristiana Sessa, Neha Chopra, C. Sessa, N. Colombo, Mahesh Parmar and Hal W. Hirte. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, ESMO Open, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, British Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact