F. Molitor

2.8k citations
26 papers · 2.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

F. Molitor

26 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

F. Molitor
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Materials Chemistry 1.9k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 937
  • Biomedical Engineering 428
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 135
Replace B. Krauss with:
B. Krauss Germany
François Triozon France
Yijian Ouyang United States
Е. Е. Вдовин Russia
U. Zeitler Netherlands
Gregory M. Rutter United States
Kristen Kaasbjerg Denmark
Jairo Velasco United States
Thiti Taychatanapat Japan
Yuji Awano Japan
F. Molitor relative to B. Krauss Germany B. Krauss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
B. Krauss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Molitor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Molitor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Molitor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Molitor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Molitor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Molitor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Molitor. The network helps show where F. Molitor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Molitor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Molitor Line = papers co-authored together F. Molitor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009309
2 2008282
3 2008189
4 2007188
5 2011165
6 2010118
7 2007117
8 2009110
9 2012104
10 201197
11 201065
12 201153
13 200750
14 201045
15 201139
16 200936
17 201031
18 200728
19 201228
20 200722

About F. Molitor

F. Molitor is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 26 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphene research and applications (25 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (21 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (6 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (6 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (5 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (3 papers), Low-power high-performance VLSI design (2 papers) and Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (1.9k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (937 citations), Biomedical Engineering (428 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (135 citations). F. Molitor has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, India and France. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Stampfer, Thomas Ihn, K. Ensslin, J. Güttinger, David Graf, Arnhild Jacobsen, Ludger Wirtz, K. Ensslin, S. Dröscher and A. Jungen. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Applied Physics Letters, New Journal of Physics, Nature Communications and Frontiers of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact