F. Molinet

435 citations
29 papers · 307 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

F. Molinet

24 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers

F. Molinet
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 174
  • Aerospace Engineering 111
  • Numerical Analysis 16
  • Mathematical Physics 23
  • Environmental Engineering 33
Replace E. Lüneburg with:
E. Lüneburg Germany
Junichi Nakayama Japan
Daljit S. Ahluwalia United States
S. N. Bhattacharyya India
Ivan Sofronov Russia
Il‐Suek Koh South Korea
Alireza Mazaheri United States
Stuart C. Hawkins Australia
John W. Goodrich United States
Ursula Voß Germany
F. Molinet relative to E. Lüneburg Germany E. Lüneburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
E. Lüneburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Molinet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Molinet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Molinet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Molinet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Molinet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Molinet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Molinet. The network helps show where F. Molinet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside F. Molinet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Molinet Line = papers co-authored together F. Molinet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199276
2 199352
3 200534
4 199727
5
Méthodes asymptotiques en électromagnétisme
199426
6 197715
7 200515
8 199012
9 19959
10 19877
11 19955
12 20054
13 20084
14 19774
15 19874
16 19912
17 20062
18 20092
19 19931
20 20031

About F. Molinet

F. Molinet is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Numerical Analysis and Environmental Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (20 papers), Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (10 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (3 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (3 papers), Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing (2 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (2 papers) and Optical Coatings and Gratings (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (174 citations), Aerospace Engineering (111 citations), Numerical Analysis (16 citations), Mathematical Physics (23 citations) and Environmental Engineering (33 citations). F. Molinet has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Bouché, R. Mittra, I. V. Andronov, W. Holm, W. Keydel, David E. Stein, Wolfgang‐M. Boerner, W. Wiesbeck, Dag T. Gjessing and Dino Giuli. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Comptes Rendus Physique, Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine and IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact