F. Melsen

2.1k citations
38 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

F. Melsen

37 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

F. Melsen
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 851
  • Equine 103
  • Nephrology 184
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 344
  • Oncology 407
Replace S. Vedi with:
S. Vedi United Kingdom
L. Mosekilde Denmark
Ethan M. Braunstein United States
Z Jaworski Canada
Frost Hm United States
R. Capozza Argentina
M. P. Akhter United States
R. Bruce Heppenstall United States
Isaac Leichter Israel
Ian H. Parkinson Australia
F. Melsen relative to S. Vedi United Kingdom S. Vedi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
S. Vedi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Melsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Melsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Melsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Melsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Melsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Melsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Melsen. The network helps show where F. Melsen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Melsen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Melsen Line = papers co-authored together F. Melsen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979201
2 1991184
3 1978183
4 1985128
5 1986107
6 198694
7 198577
8 199151
9 198348
10 198747
11 198243
12 199940
13 199338
14
Mineral metabolism in chronic renal failure with special reference to serum concentrations of 1.25(OH)2D and 24.25(OH)2D.
198137
15 198730
16 198926
17 199126
18 198521
19 198920
20 198018

About F. Melsen

F. Melsen is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Nephrology, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Surgery, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (13 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (12 papers), Bone health and treatments (11 papers), Bone and Joint Diseases (6 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (5 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (4 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (3 papers) and Point processes and geometric inequalities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (851 citations), Equine (103 citations), Nephrology (184 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (344 citations) and Oncology (407 citations). F. Melsen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Leif Mosekilde, Erik Fink Eriksen, L. Mosekilde, S. E. KOLD, A. Vesterby, Birte Melsen, H.J.G. Gundersen, J. HICKMAN, Torben Steiniche and O. H. Sørensen. Their work appears in journals such as Bone, Equine Veterinary Journal, Apmis, Journal of Biomechanics and HOMO.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact