F. Matthew Kramer

2.4k citations
35 papers · 1.8k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

F. Matthew Kramer

35 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

F. Matthew Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Pharmacy 140
  • Occupational Therapy 97
  • Sensory Systems 93
  • Applied Psychology 90
  • Physiology 445
Replace J.E.R. Frijters with:
J.E.R. Frijters Netherlands
Hongmei Han United States
Susan J. Torres Australia
Véronique Provencher Canada
Nicholas P. Hays United States
Neil A. King Australia
Andrea C. Buchholz Canada
Shawn M. Arent United States
Kristine Beaulieu United Kingdom
Gaston P. Bathalon United States
F. Matthew Kramer relative to J.E.R. Frijters Netherlands J.E.R. Frijters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
J.E.R. Frijters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Matthew Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Matthew Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Matthew Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Matthew Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Matthew Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Matthew Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Matthew Kramer. The network helps show where F. Matthew Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Matthew Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Matthew Kramer Line = papers co-authored together F. Matthew Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Long-term follow-up of behavioral treatment for obesity: patterns of weight regain among men and women.
1989306
2 2005256
3 2007108
4 2007104
5 199695
6 198794
7 200486
8 200485
9 198980
10 199365
11 200856
12 198754
13 198846
14 198644
15 199241
16 200238
17 201134
18 200433
19 201133
20 198830

About F. Matthew Kramer

F. Matthew Kramer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Food Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (11 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (7 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers) and Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (140 citations), Occupational Therapy (97 citations), Sensory Systems (93 citations), Applied Psychology (90 citations) and Physiology (445 citations). F. Matthew Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Mary Kaye Snell, Jean L. Forster, Harris R. Lieberman, Robert W. Jeffery, Armand V. Cardello, Philip J. Niro, Robert W. Jeffery, Gaston P. Bathalon, Herbert L. Meiselman and Larry L. Lesher. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Food Quality and Preference, Health Psychology, Obesity and Physiology & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact