F. Matthew Kramer

36 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

F. Matthew Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Pharmacy 150
  • Occupational Therapy 105
  • Sensory Systems 106
  • Applied Psychology 103
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 129
Replace Hongmei Han with:
Hongmei Han United States
Joanne E. Cecil United Kingdom
Susan J. Torres Australia
Véronique Provencher Canada
Neil A. King Australia
Nicholas P. Hays United States
Andrea C. Buchholz Canada
Linda G. Bandini United States
Ingrid C. Fedoroff Canada
Shawn M. Arent United States
F. Matthew Kramer relative to Hongmei Han United States Hongmei Han's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Hongmei Han · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Matthew Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Matthew Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Matthew Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Matthew Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Matthew Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Matthew Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Matthew Kramer. The network helps show where F. Matthew Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Matthew Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Matthew Kramer Line = papers co-authored together F. Matthew Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Long-term follow-up of behavioral treatment for obesity: patterns of weight regain among men and women.
1989317
2 2005270
3 2007139
4 1996110
5 2007109
6 198798
7 200497
8 200496
9 198986
10 199367
11 200858
12 198754
13 198849
14 198646
15 200445
16 199244
17 200239
18 200135
19 201134
20 201133

About F. Matthew Kramer

F. Matthew Kramer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Food Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (12 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (7 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (150 citations), Occupational Therapy (105 citations), Sensory Systems (106 citations), Applied Psychology (103 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (129 citations). F. Matthew Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Mary Kaye Snell, Jean L. Forster, Harris R. Lieberman, Robert W. Jeffery, Armand V. Cardello, Herbert L. Meiselman, Philip J. Niro, Robert W. Jeffery, Gaston P. Bathalon and Larry L. Lesher. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Health Psychology, Food Quality and Preference, Obesity and Physiology & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact