F. Lees
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Parasitology top 5%
Papers in
- Ecology 9
- Parasite Biology and Host Interactions 9
-
- Bird parasitology and diseases 4
- Parasites and Host Interactions 4
- Co-authors
- J. W. A. Turner (3 shared papers)G. Gettinby (12 shared papers)Crawford W. Revie (12 shared papers)Magnus Peterson (3 shared papers)Peter J. Barry (3 shared papers)D.V. Seal (2 shared papers)Mark Baillie (6 shared papers)L.A. Liversedge (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Lancet (4 papers)Journal of Fish Diseases (4 papers)Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (4 papers)Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (3 papers)Emergency Medicine Journal (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorwayChile
In The Last Decade
F. Lees
28 papers receiving 1.4k citations
F. Lees's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Ophthalmology 414
- Parasitology 155
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 264
- Ecology 318
- Small Animals 63
Countries citing papers authored by F. Lees
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Lees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Lees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Lees. The network helps show where F. Lees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside F. Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Natural History and Prognosis of Cervical Spondylosis Hit paper breakdown → | 1963 | 333 |
| 2 | 2006 | 313 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 159 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 114 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 108 | |
| 6 | 1964 | 68 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 11 | 1962 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 31 | |
| 14 | 1962 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1963 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 13 |
About F. Lees
F. Lees is a scholar working on Ecology, Parasitology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (9 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (4 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (4 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (2 papers) and Helminth infection and control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (414 citations), Parasitology (155 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (264 citations), Ecology (318 citations) and Small Animals (63 citations). F. Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Chile. Frequent co-authors include J. W. A. Turner, G. Gettinby, Crawford W. Revie, Magnus Peterson, Peter J. Barry, D.V. Seal, Mark Baillie, L.A. Liversedge, Sarah Dickie and Ian Zealley. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Fish Diseases, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery and Emergency Medicine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.