F. John Bourne

131 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

F. John Bourne
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Equine 332
  • Small Animals 938
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 1.3k
  • Microbiology 521
  • Animal Science and Zoology 780
Replace Marcus Georg Doherr with:
Marcus Georg Doherr Switzerland
Hajime Tsujimoto Japan
Victor P. M. G. Rutten Netherlands
Dirk Werling United Kingdom
Atsuhiko Hasegawa Japan
John F. Timoney United States
Roy D. Berghaus United States
William J. A. Saville United States
Deborah M. Haines Canada
Daria N. Love Australia
F. John Bourne relative to Marcus Georg Doherr Switzerland Marcus Georg Doherr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marcus Georg Doherr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. John Bourne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. John Bourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. John Bourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. John Bourne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. John Bourne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. John Bourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. John Bourne. The network helps show where F. John Bourne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. John Bourne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. John Bourne Line = papers co-authored together F. John Bourne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005352
2 1977225
3 2005170
4 1971160
5
The transfer of immunoglobins IgG, IgA and IgM from serum to colostrum and milk in the sow.
1973142
6 2006136
7 1984135
8 1986116
9 2007101
10 200577
11
Half-lives of immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM in the serum of new-born pigs.
197375
12 198772
13 198765
14 200760
15 200960
16 200556
17 198455
18 198754
19 197353
20
Pathogenesis and diagnosis of infections with Mycobacterium bovis in cattle. Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB.
200050

About F. John Bourne

F. John Bourne is a scholar working on Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Microbiology, Immunology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 134 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal health and immunology (38 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (17 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (16 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (16 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (13 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (13 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (12 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (332 citations), Small Animals (938 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (1.3k citations), Microbiology (521 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (780 citations). F. John Bourne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include T.J. Newby, Jill Curtis, C.R. Stokes, Roșie Woodroffe, G. Gettinby, Christl Ann Donnelly, Chris R. Stokes, W. Ivan Morrison, John Peter McInerney and Christopher Stokes. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Veterinary Science, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, Equine Veterinary Journal, American Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact